New Standard Webcasting solution

Using the Church Webcasting System, YouTube, etc. Including cameras and mixers.
aclawson
Senior Member
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#31

Post by aclawson »

Do you have the specific model of the USB capture?
rolandc
Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 8:20 pm

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#32

Post by rolandc »

Startech SVID2USB2

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000O5 ... UTF8&psc=1

With open broadcaster you can use several and eliminate the video mixer.
Roland
russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 34505
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#33

Post by russellhltn »

Do you run yours under Windows or LInux? Because if you're starting with a older computer, the Windows is likely out of date.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.

So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
rolandc
Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 8:20 pm

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#34

Post by rolandc »

We are using W7 on everything but I have tested it on an older Clerk PC with XP, works fine. We even tried it on a Vista laptop, works.

Not a fan of Linux.
Roland
Aczlan
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Upstate, NY, USA

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#35

Post by Aczlan »

I was sent a PM asking how I setup Open Broadcaster to connect to the streaming server.
I thought that might be useful to have (somewhat) documented, so I am posting that info here.
You go into the event setup and copy the "Link" and the "Stream Name" under "Broadcast Info" (see the screenshot below):
Broadcast Portal Settings
Broadcast Portal Settings
BroadcastPortal.JPG (43.28 KiB) Viewed 1714 times
Those go into the OpenBroadcaster software by clicking on "Settings" then going to the "Broadcast Settings" section. The "Link" URL goes into the "FMD URL" box and the "Stream Name" goes into the "Play Path/Stream Key" box (as shown below):
OpenBroadcaster.JPG
Broadcast Settings page of Open Broadcaster
(61.12 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Hope that helps.

Aaron Z
Aczlan
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Upstate, NY, USA

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#36

Post by Aczlan »

Also, Open Broadcaster did NOT work on my laptop (2009ish Dell with a first generation i5 m430 processor and integrated graphics). Apparently the graphics don't support Directx10?

Aaron Z
eanderson
New Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:06 am
Location: Midway, UT

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#37

Post by eanderson »

I just got an email forwarded 4 times that our Stake should purchase this equipment. Apparently the communication for technical issues such as using new hardware for Webcast goes this path?
CHQ -> FM Group -> Stake President -> Stake Clerk -> STS (ME). What a terrible way to communicate.
User avatar
johnshaw
Senior Member
Posts: 2273
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Syracuse, UT

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#38

Post by johnshaw »

eanderson wrote:I just got an email forwarded 4 times that our Stake should purchase this equipment. Apparently the communication for technical issues such as using new hardware for Webcast goes this path?
CHQ -> FM Group -> Stake President -> Stake Clerk -> STS (ME). What a terrible way to communicate.
I don't understand, how would any other method be better? Sometimes an STS is not in the picture. Sometimes a HC is doing webcasting, sometimes it is the stake clerk. And there is alredy a policy that defines this info available to this chain of command. So technically the email is redundant.
“A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom.”
― Thomas Paine, Common Sense
rsidwell
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:57 pm
Location: Riverside, California, USA

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#39

Post by rsidwell »

johnshaw wrote:
eanderson wrote:I just got an email forwarded 4 times that our Stake should purchase this equipment. Apparently the communication for technical issues such as using new hardware for Webcast goes this path?
CHQ -> FM Group -> Stake President -> Stake Clerk -> STS (ME). What a terrible way to communicate.
I don't understand, how would any other method be better? Sometimes an STS is not in the picture. Sometimes a HC is doing webcasting, sometimes it is the stake clerk. And there is alredy a policy that defines this info available to this chain of command. So technically the email is redundant.
This may be the official chain of command, but a way for Stake Technology Specialists to get a "head's up" about coming changes would help us to be better prepared when the official requests finally reach us. In the Roles and Responsibilities page (https://www.lds.org/help/support/meetin ... lang=eng#4), the first responsibility listed for the STS is to "stay current on meetinghouse technology products, services, and policies". What is the best way to do this?
russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 34505
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: New Standard Webcasting solution

#40

Post by russellhltn »

eanderson wrote:I just got an email forwarded 4 times that our Stake should purchase this equipment.
That's also listed in the Webcast Policies and Guidelines.

If you've got questions, the Help Center would be the starting point to look for information. Of course the forum is a good place to see what others are talking about.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.

So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
Post Reply

Return to “Non-Interactive Webcasting”