Tech Forum

On the other hand, the data could be generated on a per need basis for a given project by the members working on it.

I understand how complex this can get, but at the same time, dev/QA MUST have that fake data already to perform their test.
I CANNOT believe they are working with real data, that would be a legal issue in so many countries, so the fake data MUST already be available. Or at least with scrubbed data...

...and I have heard there are fewer of them than anyone would expect Yeah, that's one reason I wish there was more openness to open-source help. There are a lot of members in the programming world (including myself) that could definitely help. Just thinking of the in-house tools we do for our stake...

It's been over a year. We try to motivated all leaders and members in the stake to use this app rather than social network, where technically youth under the age of 13 are not allowed. But the fact that it's a phone only thing blocks it's adoption and we see a myriad of social network being used. We...

I've tried reporting issues with Vidyo app on the vendor website, but I can't unless I have access to the admin account. So what is the process for us to raise issues so they can be grouped and brought up to the vendor ?

There is no log files since 2014 in that location on Windows 10. Did the location changed, or do they need to be activated ?

Ok. Thanks.

The other section has a limited set of choices apparently set by the church headquarter. The ones created by the ward don't appear. There is no way to enter freely the value in the field either.
Is it a defect ? a missing feature ? Will we have to still use paper format for other donations.

If the stake PFR is not able to do it, the stake president should ask the FM Group manager to make the change. This would be the process, but even the manager is not reactive... it takes several emails and calls to get it done. Even when they finally do it, they do it with this option : This locati...

This is what we were told by the temple president. Yes the manual is the reference, but since it does not address the contrary: member currently Temple worker can or cannot be called in a bishopric (or other mentioned callings in the manual) So by default it is assumed that the contrary is the same ...