Search found 104 matches
Just looked at this with a member of my ward too. From the directory, the link to "Show on map" only shows up for him on his own listing. It's as though the "Stake Visibility" setting is screening out this feature, even though that same setting is allowing address, phone numbers,...
- Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:46 pm
- Forum: Church Account
- Topic: Deleting/Removing an LDS Account Login?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 17910
I realize this is an older thread, but I came across a reason for removing an account. One of our ward members set up a non-member account shortly after being baptized, when she didn't have her member number handy. She has since established a member account, and now wants to delete the non-member lo...
- Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:42 pm
- Forum: Calendar
- Topic: Problems with blocking resources
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2114
I can confirm the behavior first discussed, as I have double-booked a resource that was assigned to another ward. I did not get any error message or conflict notification. I also agree that this was most likely permitted because I am a BUILDING SCHEDULER, and presumably I should have remembered that...
- Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:07 am
- Forum: Leader and Clerk Resources
- Topic: Leader and Clerk Resources intro window doesn't go away
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2612
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:25 pm
- Forum: Member Tools
- Topic: Custom calling not showing up in LDS Tools
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1746
I've got a custom calling in MLS that shows up fine on http://www.lds.org, but does not show up in LDS Tools. Any ideas what I should check to fix this?
- Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:03 pm
- Forum: Calendar
- Topic: Calendar issues - Stake people,and Out of unit members need to see ward calendars,
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2523
I know that the calendar development team is aware of this and is working on a fix. I assume this is the root cause of behavior where branch presidency members, whose records are in their home ward, only have some rights and roles. For example the branch clerk shows up on the list of APPROVERS, but...