Page 1 of 2
Branch vs Ward
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:18 pm
What's the basic difference between a branch and a ward? I am thinking that a branch can cover a larger area than a ward but in some areas of the US there are wards that go for miles. So when is it appropriate to create a branch instead of a ward or visa versa?
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:27 pm
The wikipedia page describes how they differ. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_%28LDS_Church%29
. Scroll down to the section 'Wards and branches. Hope this helps.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:37 pm
The official information is provided in the CHI, Book1, 2006, p 170 -171. But for those who do not have access to the CHI the wikipedia information will do.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:45 pm
Thanks. I hadn't checked wikipedia.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:56 pm
I'm not sure what information you're looking for. Off the top of my head, I believe a Branch has a streamlined leadership structure that makes it a better fit for small congregations, but I don't remember the differences.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:06 pm
Having lived in ward that was bigger then the stake I'm in now I would say it's not about geography at all, at least as far as I know. One of the major determining factors is whether of not you have enough active, worthy, tithe paying, priesthood for all the callings that require priesthood (bishopric/clerks, priesthood quorums, young men).
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:46 pm
Techgy wrote:What's the basic difference between a branch and a ward?
All of the information referenced so far is good. The basic difference is that a branch is usually small and created in an area with very few members. They function as best they can and use the basic programs of the Church.
Ideally, a branch will grow in numbers and strength and eventually become a ward. A ward is created when there are sufficient numbers and strength of members to carry out the full program of the Church.
A ward does not have to have been a branch first. If there are enough members in an area, a ward can be created. This happens most often in established areas of the Church, such as when a large and strong ward is divided to become two, or two large wards are divided to create a third ward in the same area.
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:39 am
I appreciate everyone's input. Much of what you have stated I had already considered. It was mostly curiosity. Our stake will shortly be going through some ward boundary changes and I was simply wondering what the basis was for the creation of a branch vs ward.
We have two branches in our stake. One is a singles branch and the other a deaf branch. Both are relatively small in number although they cover a rather wide area.
Thanks everyone for your thoughts.
Branch Size Relevance
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:22 pm
I'm not sure if this is useful, but here goes. A branch can have plenty of members, including worthy priesthood holders, when it is outside boundaries of a stake.
A case in point is our branch. A couple hundred people, including recommend holding MP holders, but two hundred miles from the nearest ward, and the stake there is already huge, geographically.
So, I think geography comes to play when you really have relatively few members living in a large area. If we were inside the boundaries of a stake, or even neatly neighboring it, we could easily be a ward (I've lived in a smaller ward).
Theoretically speaking. When I was in the district presidency here, our goal was to become a stake. A lofty goal for around 350 members to be sure, but if you don't reach out you'll never get anywhere.
The membership is growing now, and I see young people come to the Church and get married in the temple. For some time that didn't seem to happen.
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:50 pm
velska wrote:I'm not sure if this is useful, but here goes. A branch can have plenty of members, including worthy priesthood holders, when it is outside boundaries of a stake.
True. A Ward can only exist inside a Stake. No Stake, no Ward.
But a Branch can exist inside a Stake.