Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:12 am
by MorettiDP
McDanielCA wrote:You're right. Thanks for the feedback on that. The translators and interpreters did a great job for the amount of prep time they were given.

Of course!

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:24 pm
by jvoracek
I received the e-mail regarding the LDSTalk today! I look forward to download a copy of the conference. I enjoyed reading the interview with Alan! Is there a "set in stone" date when the conference will be available to download?

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:03 pm
by lajackson
LEGENDARYMEMBER wrote:Is there a "set in stone" date when the conference will be available to download?

The only "set in stone" dates I know of in the history of the Church would be the September 22nd dates from 1823 to 1827. [grin]

Still, it should not be much longer.

Bi-annual technology & project review

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:24 pm
by ndalessio
Great meeting and very informative. I would suggest to have the meeting at least every 6 months in order to review key projects and technology initiatives. I'd don't think there would be any shortage of topics.

Thanks for taking the time. It is appreciated.

Nick D'Alessio

Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:47 pm
by jvoracek
lajackson wrote:The only "set in stone" dates I know of in the history of the Church would be the September 22nd dates from 1923 to 1827. [grin]

Still, it should not be much longer.
Haha, of course! I should of known not to use that expression online!:D
I believe "1923" should be typed as "1823".

Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:50 pm
by lajackson
LEGENDARYMEMBER wrote:Haha, of course! I should of known not to use that expression online!:D
I believe "1923" should be typed as "1823".
Oops. Yes, 1823 is correct. (I never was much good at telling a joke.)
Thanks.

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:32 am
by McDanielCA
There is no set date. The entire event has to be reviewed by correlation. Last year it only took two weeks, but this year it may take longer due to General Conference. And, thankfully, General Conference takes priority :)

But, rest assured, as soon as it is approved, you will have access to it!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:13 pm
by mkmurray
McDanielCA wrote:There is no set date. The entire event has to be reviewed by correlation. Last year it only took two weeks, but this year it may take longer due to General Conference. And, thankfully, General Conference takes priority :)

But, rest assured, as soon as it is approved, you will have access to it!
Any updates on this?

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:27 pm
by McDanielCA
Just that it is still being reviewed. Sorry for the delay.

TechTalk 2009 Download

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:41 pm
by heyring
Might I suggest changing the wording to say something like "as soon as it becomes available" instead of "available for download here within two weeks".

Just a thought :)