A group exemption letter

Discuss basic duties of stake and ward clerks, including where to begin.
russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 34513
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: A group exemption letter

#11

Post by russellhltn »

Keep in mind this is one account per unit. So, it's going to be a "ward" account, not just a "RS" or "Sunday School" account. It's probably a good idea to sit down with the other leaders of the ward and hash out how this is going to work. As I understand it, you can have one meeting with break-out sessions.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.

So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
BrianEdwards
Senior Member
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 10:42 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: A group exemption letter

#12

Post by BrianEdwards »

Two meetings can be held simultaneously using the unit account, each with breakout rooms. And coordination will be a must, along with the standard virtual need for communication of what link to click, when to click it, password to supply, and all that jazz.
RobCFrame
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:01 pm

Re: A group exemption letter

#13

Post by RobCFrame »

The first paragraph on the topic of Zoom Licenses states: "When free accounts do not meet local unit needs, a Church-provided Zoom license can be requested". Does it cost the church more money for each ward that is assigned a Zoom License? If so, shouldn't we be encouraging them to use the free accounts if they "meet local unit needs", and only supply the wards with new Zoom Licenses for specific needs? Otherwise, if it costs the church no additional per unit costs, why wouldn't we just assign a license to every ward at the start?
User avatar
Mikerowaved
Community Moderators
Posts: 4744
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Layton, UT

Re: A group exemption letter

#14

Post by Mikerowaved »

RobCFrame wrote:The first paragraph on the topic of Zoom Licenses states: "When free accounts do not meet local unit needs, a Church-provided Zoom license can be requested". Does it cost the church more money for each ward that is assigned a Zoom License? If so, shouldn't we be encouraging them to use the free accounts if they "meet local unit needs", and only supply the wards with new Zoom Licenses for specific needs? Otherwise, if it costs the church no additional per unit costs, why wouldn't we just assign a license to every ward at the start?
That's a fair question. For some units, the free version of Zoom works well, but others have a hard time with the restrictions. It's the second group that often have gone out and purchased their own Zoom account using budget funds. What the church is offering is an enterprise account that has more features than what a typical bishop might get for use within his ward, including webinars and rooms. While they haven't revealed the exact figures, they let us know the cost per church account is quite a bit less than what a ward or stake can get on their own.

So yes, if the free version works, that would be the best way to go. If not, then using the church's account is preferred over personal accounts.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
Post Reply

Return to “Getting Started for New Clerks”