Alan_Brown wrote:That's not my experience. I'm curious what your reasoning is for claiming that a refresh is requested. And even if a refresh is requested, I can't imagine why you would have to put member record changes on hold -- they should be processed just fine, even if it were true that a refresh is requested.
I agree with Alan. When a refresh request is sent, it takes a few hours before HQ processes the request and sends the refresh back to the unit. So a "refresh" request during the install of 2.8 (if there is one) would not cause a refresh until you do a Send/Receive a few hours after installation. It should not interfere with the record changes.