As far as any policy for wireless access you can read the wireless access policy for meetinghouse? thread in this forum.jsfriedman wrote:I have been "fighting" for months with my local facilities group to try to get an outlet installed so I can install a WAP in our Stake Center cultural hall and in the back hallway. We already have Internet and wireless in our FHC and Stake Clerk's office. First they did not like the location of the outlet because it would be external. Then they refused saying Internet was not approved in meetinghouses outside the FHC - after which I sent them the 2/28 policy letter. Now since they learned it was for a WAP- they say wireless Internet has not been approved. A policy letter that specifically mentions that "wireless" Internet is also approved might help me get through this quagmire.
You should also take a look at the Introduction to Meetinghouse Internetpage in the Clerk and Technology Supportsite. It provides meetinghouse internet implementation guidance and references to applicable policy letters and documents. (I know. It doesn't help resolve the need for a policy letter.)
I recommend you read the policy letters and other applicable documentation as well applicable threads in this forum. Once you have a good understanding of policies, procedures, and appropriate information from the forums, discuss with the stake president the stake internet access plan. Take the applicable documents with you in your council with the stake president. Once you have the stake president's desires you can approach the FM group to discuss installing the hardware. Keep in mind that the FM group is interested in safety, building esthetics, and structural soundness of the building. Placing any hardware in hallways, corridors, classrooms and the such visible to the general membership will in all likelyhood not be approved.
I know that dealing with the FM group people in many places can be difficult. Personalities definitely come into play. I was able to turn around what I would call a quite difficult and imovable director by sitting down with him face to face and explaining what we really needed and the background for that need. I used Church policy letters and other documents to help him understand. He now works with me quite eagerly such that now he even makes recommedations to improve original concepts and plans. Of course there was a two way education process that went on during that turnaround meeting. I now have a better understanding of facilities (building) management in the Church.