Not to fork the thread, but when I served on the high council some years ago, our stake president specifically instructed the HC members to not attend bishopric meetings unless invited and then to do so only on an invite by invite basis. In his mind, the bishop should reach out to the HC if needed but the HC should "stay out of the bishop's chili" for the most part. We were instructed to attend most ward council meetings as we were able but were again cautioned that we were there primarily as an observer to support the bishop and to be careful to not be seen as directing the council's business.
Of course, every stake president has the keys to implement as they feel inspired. I just found this thread mildly entertaining given the direction in my stake when I served on the HC (not the stake I'm in currently). I think the church has the ability to code the calendar allow stake members on ward private calendars if they want to and (personally) take the fact the it cannot be done as a sign that either it is not specifically desired or not high enough on their priority list to warrant coding time.
Adding ward's High Council representative to private calendar?
-
davesudweeks
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 9:16 pm
- Location: Washington, USA
-
chriswirick
- New Member
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:57 am
Re: Adding ward's High Council representative to private calendar?
Or maybe it's just a request they've never received before (thus never considered?), which is what their tech folks told me.davesudweeks wrote:I think the church has the ability to code the calendar allow stake members on ward private calendars if they want to and (personally) take the fact the it cannot be done as a sign that either it is not specifically desired or not high enough on their priority list to warrant coding time.
Our High Council rep comes to all our Bishopric meetings and is much-appreciated there. I'm not sure if that's the stake's directive or just him responding to the wants/needs of my Bishop (I've only been in the Bishopric for a month).
-
russellhltn
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 36416
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: Adding ward's High Council representative to private calendar?
According to the General Handbook 5.5.1:chriswirick wrote:Our High Council rep comes to all our Bishopric meetings and is much-appreciated there. I'm not sure if that's the stake's directive or just him responding to the wants/needs of my Bishop (I've only been in the Bishopric for a month).
That certainly encompasses a range of attendance.As invited or assigned, high councilors attend bishopric and ward council meetings.
My guess is that usually the meeting is at a standard time and place (1st and 3rd Sunday at 9AM) so it's not really necessary to have access to the calendar to keep track. Having to have access to the calendar suggest the meetings are all over the place in terms of scheduling.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
-
chriswirick
- New Member
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:57 am
Re: Adding ward's High Council representative to private calendar?
Yes, 90% of the time the meetings are at the same time/place. It's the 10% that sticks in the gears.russellhltn wrote:chriswirick wrote:My guess is that usually the meeting is at a standard time and place (1st and 3rd Sunday at 9AM) so it's not really necessary to have access to the calendar to keep track. Having to have access to the calendar suggest the meetings are all over the place in terms of scheduling.
"I was at the church at 8 am but no one else was there."
"Didn't you get the text about the change?"
"No, but I didn't have service much of the day yesterday."
"Sorry about that."
Calendars are best when dealing with dates/times.