mkmurray is correct. In fact, the whole LUWS side will be drastically redesigned (with a lot of the input from these forums) to compensate for the flaws and lack of needed features in the current system. I've made curriculum and the priesthood departments aware of this thread.mkmurray wrote:One thing to take in consideration is that not everything is done under strict policy or careful design.
Don't get me wrong. I imagine the design, layout, format, and content of the site went under heavy planning, approval, and QA. That probably applies to almost every single part of the site. But sometimes it's the way it is because some developer or manager had the freedom to design it how they wanted and others thought it looked fine.
I guess all I'm saying is that I think it is a bad assumption that every design detail was linked to some present or future policy.
But that doesn't mean you can't ask here if it was?