cognifloyd wrote:Calling LUS to get access was entirely fruitless, as the classic site is "unsupported".
Hmmm. That doesn't sound right. I'd get a member of the stake presidency to call and ask to escalate the issue.
cognifloyd wrote:Calling LUS to get access was entirely fruitless, as the classic site is "unsupported".
cognifloyd wrote:OK, next time I get a request about the classic website, maybe I'll come back here and get those details. Calling LUS to get access was entirely fruitless, as the classic site is "unsupported".
lajackson wrote:Two stake administrators need to work together.
That is true. If there is no stake admin, the stake president will need to send a letter/fax to get one added. But cognifloyd said,RussellHltn wrote:That's assuming you have a stake admin. (If you have one, then you can add a second.)
If there is no stake admin (which is what I thought was going on), then CHQ will have to add one.
cognifloyd wrote:Yah, I'm the Stake Website Administrator, and I've turned off as much as I can.
JohnShaw wrote:Although it really is to bad that there isn't a Ward Website, or a Stake Website that is a central location, like there was (or is technically)
Well, that's a matter of opinion. The Newsletter application that you linked to is a good replacement for the News and Information section of the Classic Ward and Stake Websites. But I don't see how it replaces the way that the Classic site functioned as a central location. The Tools menu links the apps that are there, but it doesn't really provide that functionality either.MerrillDL wrote:Actually, there is. It's in beta right now, but is available for use right now. Go to beta.lds.org/member-news. It can be the repository for current events and other happenings for the ward.