That has never been the case. See responses to your similar question in another thread.Kerryhaxton wrote:We have the issue that is addressed at the biginnning (Callings not in sync). I asked the unit to perform this, but the clerk said that in the past this caused Home teaching , and other things to get dropped... Is this still the case...
Website NOT in sync with MLS
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15156
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.
-
- Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:13 pm
- Location: Provo, Utah, USA
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15156
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
Have you worked through the procedure detailed near the beginning of this thread? It seems like that should clean up these inconsistencies, and it's a process you can do yourself.rpyne wrote:I just noticed that we have a number of callings showing in CDOL that have been removed from MLS for, in some cases, more than a month. Will this eventually be corrected or do I need to compile a list and send it to CDOL support?
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.
-
- Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:13 pm
- Location: Provo, Utah, USA
aebrown wrote:Have you worked through the procedure detailed near the beginning of this thread? It seems like that should clean up these inconsistencies, and it's a process you can do yourself.
So you are telling me to replace my clean data with CHQs bad data and then spend my time cleaning up their mess (again). Last time I did a refresh I was still finding and fixing their mess a month later. I don't think so, CHQ can either keep or fix their own mess. I have enough headache still trying to clean up the mess the CUBS conversion created.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:17 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
So you are saying that since being on MLS 3.3.x you have done a complete membership refresh, and cleaned up any discrepancies in membership records, addresses, callings, etc. and the changes in MLS didn't make it back to CDOL?rpyne wrote:So you are telling me to replace my clean data with CHQs bad data and then spend my time cleaning up their mess (again). Last time I did a refresh I was still finding and fixing their mess a month later. I don't think so, CHQ can either keep or fix their own mess. I have enough headache still trying to clean up the mess the CUBS conversion created.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:02 pm
- Location: Laurel, Maryland, United States of America
I have the same problem with my ward's website as the original poster. I am willing to try the procedure outlined, but I have some reservations. Will anything else (like home and visiting teaching assignments, HT/VT supervisor assignments, nonmember spouse records, or anything that I haven't considered) potentially be changed by this procedure? I have spent considerable time making sure our records are accurate on MLS; I want to make sure that I don't lose anything.
It seems like a better procedure would be the opposite: wipe out the CDOL data and refresh it from the MLS data, especially in the matter of callings, since all of those are done locally.
It seems like a better procedure would be the opposite: wipe out the CDOL data and refresh it from the MLS data, especially in the matter of callings, since all of those are done locally.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 10515
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:30 am
- Location: USA, TX
esok wrote:I have the same problem with my ward's website as the original poster. I am willing to try the procedure outlined, but I have some reservations. Will anything else (like home and visiting teaching assignments, HT/VT supervisor assignments, nonmember spouse records, or anything that I haven't considered) potentially be changed by this procedure? I have spent considerable time making sure our records are accurate on MLS; I want to make sure that I don't lose anything.
If you follow the procedures found in the section Correcting duplicate or missing callings of the wiki article Callings, only the callings will be affected. All the things you are concerned about being changed will not be affected. The last paragraph of the section mentions a less disruptive procedure for correcting a small number of missing callings.
JD Lessley
Have you tried finding your answer on the ChurchofJesusChrist.org Help Center or Tech Wiki?
Have you tried finding your answer on the ChurchofJesusChrist.org Help Center or Tech Wiki?
-
- Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:13 pm
- Location: Provo, Utah, USA
jbh001 wrote:So you are saying that since being on MLS 3.3.x you have done a complete membership refresh, and cleaned up any discrepancies in membership records, addresses, callings, etc. and the changes in MLS didn't make it back to CDOL?
No, what I am telling you is that BEFORE getting MLS 3.3.x I did a complete membership refresh as instructed by CHQ to supposedly fix some problems and it made such a mess of things that I will never do such a process again.
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15156
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
As long as your priesthood leaders support that position, you are welcome to do so. But it seems to me that although keeping your MLS records clean has some value, it has always been more important to make sure that the CHQ records are correct. And that is becoming even more important as website permissions are tied to CHQ records of what callings people have. Suppose, for example, that your own calling were completely correct in MLS, but not on CDOL? You wouldn't even be able to login to CDOL or do a variety of other important tasks.rpyne wrote:No, what I am telling you is that BEFORE getting MLS 3.3.x I did a complete membership refresh as instructed by CHQ to supposedly fix some problems and it made such a mess of things that I will never do such a process again.
I know it can be frustrating to have to redo work. But there does seem to be a reasonable hope that the procedure described in the wiki for Correcting duplicate or missing callings will finally get all the callings in sync, so I would be wary of rejecting that option completely based on a bad experience with an earlier version of MLS.
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.
-
- Church Employee
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:12 am
- Location: South Jordan, UT, USA
We discussed that option and for now that option will not be supported. The good news is that eventually the Leader and Clerk application will support editing callings and the changes made their will be directly made within CDOL. That way you will be able to clean up the CDOL data. Any callings that are also in MLS will get updated, but any duplicates/old callings that you are deleting will just go away.esok wrote:It seems like a better procedure would be the opposite: wipe out the CDOL data and refresh it from the MLS data, especially in the matter of callings, since all of those are done locally.