On one hand, I can understand not wanting to publish a detailed list. It's likely to start a debate from leaders who think they should have more and a negative reaction from members who think it should be more restricted.scgallafent wrote:I don't think that is likely to happen.sbradshaw wrote:@scgallafent, Would it be possible for this extensive access table to be published somewhere – for example, in Leader and Clerk Resources so it can be kept up-to-date?
But on the other hand, it makes it hard to know if someone is not seeing what they should, or worse, more than they should. Without any reference, this would be a serious barrier to reporting bugs regarding exposed information.
I'm not sure as I have an answer, but perhaps some indications of what it is for some fields would be useful.