I don't think so. The VPN is only used for some data. The whole internet doesn't go through there.
Then why is it so much faster to run a speed test when you bypass the 881? And why does the speed test tell me that my signal is originating in the wrong city? (It gives me the correct city when I bypass.) I conclude that every speed test I've run has gone across the VPN. I know you can't get internet when that light is off (but that's not conclusive).
And the webcast solution is based on Azure. So it's not inside the VPN.
Irrelevant. Don't get hung up on the idea that QOS is entirely for intranet service. QOS is regularly used for webcasts, video conferencing, VOIP, and other mission critical high-bandwidth or low-latency applications -- even if the other end is across the Internet.
The other problem is that the church needs a configuration that works with all ISPs.
And why wouldn't it? I've outlined several reasons why it would. Your turn.
And you've already pointed out that UDP isn't very manageable.
How many people are using UDP to surf the web? We could simply block UDP. If someone felt like being fancy, we could have a switch on tm.lds.org to turn UDP on and off. I included it for completeness, not because it was an actual problem. A deliberate DDOS is always a problem, unless the church wants to have dedicated lines. In other words, even if you turn wireless off you still have this problem.
Because the Church does not choose to expend tithing funds on industrial strength bandwidth, what we have becomes a precious resource that we reserve solely for the broadcast if we wish to get the signal through to our outlying units.
That's exactly what I'm talking about, but without the unnecessary inconvenience of shutting out stake members. I'm not suggesting we run enterprise grade fiber to every building. I'm suggesting we make sane use of the DSL and cable connections that we have.
Saying "It's technically possible, but..." makes it sound like it should work but somebody is incompetent or otherwise isn't doing what they could do. It has negative connotations towards the church's technical team and/or decision makers.
Are you really going make me spell it out for you? No, I don't think church leaders are being incompetent. I do think someone has
really dropped the ball on this. (someone on the technical staff)
Do you think we are automatically perfect because we belong to the church? Does being part of the technical staff of the church make you immune to mistakes? Of course not. The Lord even chewed out Joseph from time to time. ALL of us err. You and me included. When I err, I get called on it, especially when other people are relying on me.
They didn't give us the ability to manage the 881. Fine. I get it. I wouldn't either. But that means that it needs to be properly set up to begin with. I don't think it is.
To this point, nobody has enunciated a single good reason why they haven't dealt with this. Maybe a reason exists. At this point, I conclude it is likely that there is no good reason. Either someone overlooked it, or someone doesn't want to be bothered.