I guess we agree that something needs to be added to a printout to help identify a potential for aged information. Even with the current month-by-month method of printing a LUWS calendar a person intent on having the entire year will suffer the pain of doing each month individually and never update it.RussellHltn wrote:I think that was there, and it didn't prevent the problem. I think it needs something a little stronger then that. Perhaps put it in bold or add "Preliminary - subject to change" if it's too far in the future.
Another idea is to have a watermark that identifies when it was printed accross the entire month if it is not the current month. For example if the month of July is printed within seven days of the end of June then the watermark would not then be added. But if the month of July, or beyond, was printed earlier than 23 June a watermark like "Caution! This information is dated and may not be accurate!" at 45° accross each month printed beyond the current month along with a header or footer in bold identifying the printing date would provide some visual warning.