I would like to see a Bluetooth transmitter in every chapel that reaches out to every Bluetooth-enabled phone and automatically puts the phone on Silent mode. That way people couldn't forget to silence their phones in church.
I'd also like to see this transmitter in every movie theater!
Tech Gadgets in the Chapel
-
- Member
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:51 pm
- Location: Adam-ondi-Ahman Missouri area
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 35986
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
-
- Member
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:07 pm
The phone would also have to have bluetooth turned on. I for one do not have bluetooth turned on when not in use as it reduces battery life. Dispite the legal questions, you'd probally get a better result for less cost by just printing a reminder in the bulletin to turn cell phones off or to silent.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 10508
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:30 am
- Location: USA, TX
The Bluetooth transmitter does not communicate with any devices but rather jams the signals. It is not legal in some municipalities and some states. The device is used in such places as live performance theaters and similar places to prevent communications. It is not only Bluetooth that can be jammed but cell phones and other over-the-air communications devices. You can see why it is so controversial.
The military has used these devices for some time now in areas needing extra security.
The military has used these devices for some time now in areas needing extra security.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 4237
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:32 am
- Location: Dundee, Oregon, USA
Last time I studied FCC regulations, in the USA radio transmission devices that jam other communications are also pretty serious violations of said FCC regulations.jdlessley wrote:The Bluetooth transmitter does not communicate with any devices but rather jams the signals. It is not legal in some municipalities and some states. The device is used in such places as live performance theaters and similar places to prevent communications. It is not only Bluetooth that can be jammed but cell phones and other over-the-air communications devices. You can see why it is so controversial.
The military has used these devices for some time now in areas needing extra security.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 4836
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:56 am
- Location: Layton, UT
Folks, I believe this was meant to be more sarcasm than a real suggestion.SingerGuy59 wrote:I would like to see a Bluetooth transmitter in every chapel that reaches out to every Bluetooth-enabled phone and automatically puts the phone on Silent mode. That way people couldn't forget to silence their phones in church.
I'd also like to see this transmitter in every movie theater!
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
-
- Member
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:51 pm
- Location: Adam-ondi-Ahman Missouri area
Ding, ding, ding!Mikerowaved wrote:Folks, I believe this was meant to be more sarcasm than a real suggestion.

Of course, it would be nice if there was an industry standard that could come about that would allow something like this to happen (on a per-phone opt-in basis of course).
Our Stake President insists that whoever is conducting gives a reminder at the beginning of meetings to silence the phones. The last meeting I was in one of the jokers on the high council sent a text message to the 1st Counselor during a Saturday leadership meeting, right as the Stake President was making that announcement. Yep, the counselor's phone hadn't been silenced.
That was the last time I ever heard a phone ring in a meeting.

-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 35986
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
Quoted for emphasis. It may be legal in other countries, but it's not legal in the US. However, Faraday cages are legal. Perhaps we'll see some new designs for a new generation of buildings?rmrichesjr wrote:Last time I studied FCC regulations, in the USA radio transmission devices that jam other communications are also pretty serious violations of said FCC regulations.

I have a hard time applying sarcasm to that post. I think wistful desire is closer.Mikerowaved wrote:Folks, I believe this was meant to be more sarcasm than a real suggestion.
Yeah, it would be nice, but the question of confining the results to the desired room remains.SingerGuy59 wrote:Of course, it would be nice if there was an industry standard that could come about that would allow something like this to happen (on a per-phone opt-in basis of course).
And it may move this conversation outside the realm of church tech.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:44 pm
- Location: Utah, USA
-
- New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:47 pm
- Location: Hauula, Hawaii
Device Manners Policy
Although initially proffered "tongue in cheek", you might be interested to know that your wish may just be closer than you think. Microsoft calls it Device Manners Policy. You can read about it here:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/micr ... alking-zo/
My particular phone (MotoQ9c) allows me to schedule times for it to be automatically set to vibrate so no interruptions during Church meetings (as long as they are on the calender).
Be careful what you wish for...
http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/micr ... alking-zo/
My particular phone (MotoQ9c) allows me to schedule times for it to be automatically set to vibrate so no interruptions during Church meetings (as long as they are on the calender).
Be careful what you wish for...