2009 LDSTech Talk feedback

The latest forum news and information
MorettiDP
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil

#11

Post by MorettiDP »

McDanielCA wrote:You're right. Thanks for the feedback on that. The translators and interpreters did a great job for the amount of prep time they were given.

Of course!
User avatar
jvoracek
New Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:40 pm
Location: Rexburg, ID. USA. Hometown: Highland Village, TX
Contact:

#12

Post by jvoracek »

I received the e-mail regarding the LDSTalk today! I look forward to download a copy of the conference. I enjoyed reading the interview with Alan! Is there a "set in stone" date when the conference will be available to download?
Jace Voracek
Jace@Jace-Place.com
lajackson
Community Moderators
Posts: 11475
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: US

#13

Post by lajackson »

LEGENDARYMEMBER wrote:Is there a "set in stone" date when the conference will be available to download?

The only "set in stone" dates I know of in the history of the Church would be the September 22nd dates from 1823 to 1827. [grin]

Still, it should not be much longer.
User avatar
ndalessio
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Round Rock, Texas

Bi-annual technology & project review

#14

Post by ndalessio »

Great meeting and very informative. I would suggest to have the meeting at least every 6 months in order to review key projects and technology initiatives. I'd don't think there would be any shortage of topics.

Thanks for taking the time. It is appreciated.

Nick D'Alessio
User avatar
jvoracek
New Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:40 pm
Location: Rexburg, ID. USA. Hometown: Highland Village, TX
Contact:

#15

Post by jvoracek »

lajackson wrote:The only "set in stone" dates I know of in the history of the Church would be the September 22nd dates from 1923 to 1827. [grin]

Still, it should not be much longer.
Haha, of course! I should of known not to use that expression online!:D
I believe "1923" should be typed as "1823".
Jace Voracek
Jace@Jace-Place.com
lajackson
Community Moderators
Posts: 11475
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: US

#16

Post by lajackson »

LEGENDARYMEMBER wrote:Haha, of course! I should of known not to use that expression online!:D
I believe "1923" should be typed as "1823".
Oops. Yes, 1823 is correct. (I never was much good at telling a joke.)
Thanks.
User avatar
McDanielCA
Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#17

Post by McDanielCA »

There is no set date. The entire event has to be reviewed by correlation. Last year it only took two weeks, but this year it may take longer due to General Conference. And, thankfully, General Conference takes priority :)

But, rest assured, as soon as it is approved, you will have access to it!
User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

#18

Post by mkmurray »

McDanielCA wrote:There is no set date. The entire event has to be reviewed by correlation. Last year it only took two weeks, but this year it may take longer due to General Conference. And, thankfully, General Conference takes priority :)

But, rest assured, as soon as it is approved, you will have access to it!
Any updates on this?
User avatar
McDanielCA
Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#19

Post by McDanielCA »

Just that it is still being reviewed. Sorry for the delay.
heyring
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: United States Mesa, AZ
Contact:

TechTalk 2009 Download

#20

Post by heyring »

Might I suggest changing the wording to say something like "as soon as it becomes available" instead of "available for download here within two weeks".

Just a thought :)
Post Reply

Return to “Announcements & Policies”