July 01 a much more "natural transition date."

Some discussions just don't fit into a well defined box. Use this forum to discuss general topics and issues revolving around the Church and the technology offerings we use and share.
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:47 am

July 01 a much more "natural transition date."

Postby jandereg » Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:55 am

The First Presidency Letter, 14 Dec 2018: Age Group Progression for Children and Youth states, "7. Must the transition date for age-group progression always be January? No, In areas of the world where January is not a natural transition date, areas may implement these changes based on the local transition date now followed."

If January isn't set in stone, then don't the summer months provide a far more "natural transition" for children in the United States? Syncing with the school years would be far more natural. I would even state that there is nothing natural about a January transition date.

My two cents...

Thank you

Community Administrator
Posts: 30570
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: July 01 a much more "natural transition date."

Postby russellhltn » Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:30 pm

I suspect what the First Presidency means is that not all cultures use the Gregorian calendar. So, not everyone marks the beginning of a new year on January 1.

I think the operative part is "based on the local transition date now followed" suggesting that these areas are already using those dates.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.

So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.

Return to “General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest